Shaffer Comments on Trump's Presidential Candidacy and Trump University’s Pending Trial

Our own Scott Shaffer was quoted in the Law360’s article “Unbiased Jurors Will Be Tough To Find As Trump U. Cases Progress,” which examines how Donald Trump’s criticism of U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, in response to his unsealing of a number of real estate sales booklets used at the former Trump University, will affect an upcoming trial brought by former Trump University customers, who claim they were defrauded by Trump. A high-profile trial involving a potential Presidential nominee, especially during elections, will make it difficult to facilitate a fair trial and allow forward progress in the case. The situation recalls the outcome of William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin Jones, a 1997 case before the U.S. Supreme Court involving then-President Bill Clinton. The Supreme Court found that a president does not enjoy immunity for allegations involving unofficial conduct. So, regardless of the outcome of November’s election, Trump would not be able to use his political status to interfere with the trial. Shaffer clarifies “If a sitting president doesn’t have the ability to stay a trial, a president-elect won’t.”

Add a comment

Type the following characters: romeo, niner, six, foxtrot, hotel, romeo

* Indicates a required field.

Subscribe

Recent Posts

Contributors

Archives

Jump to Page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.