Main Menu Jump to Content Search
Attorney Search
Photo of Joseph B. Weiner

Joseph B. Weiner

Associate
Print PDF

Honors

  • Joe was named for inclusion to the New York Super Lawyers Rising Stars list, a Thomson Reuters lawyer rating service for lawyers under 40, for 2019 and 2020

Education

J.D., cum laude, Fordham University School of Law, 2012

  • Associate Editor, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

B.A., summa cum laude, New York University, 2009

  • Phi Beta Kappa
  • NYU College of Arts and Science Presidential Honors Scholar

Bar & Court Admissions

  • New York, 2013
  • New Jersey, 2012
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2014
  • U.S. Tax Court, 2014
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2014
  • U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, 2019
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, 2019
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, 2019

Joseph B. Weiner is an associate in the Litigation Group focusing on complex commercial litigation matters.

Joe has substantial commercial litigation experience, representing clients in federal and state courts on matters relating to contract disputes, business torts, tax, real estate, and intellectual property.  He has managed many phases of a litigation, including taking and defending depositions, drafting briefs, arguing motions and appeals, appearing at court conferences, and advising clients on litigation strategies.

Prior to joining Olshan, Joe was a litigation associate at Katsky Korins LLP.

Professional & Community Affiliations

Member and former Secretary, New York City Bar Association Committee on State Courts of Superior Jurisdiction

  • Olshan Achieves Trial Victory in New York’s Commercial Part

    Olshan's litigation group obtained a complete victory at trial on behalf of a long standing real estate client. The plaintiffs had invested with the client in a project that went into foreclosure after the makets crashed in 2008. The plaintiffs alleged a series of oral side deals, and also claimed that due to their lack of sophistication, the client owed them a fiduciary duty. They sought over $9 million after a three day bench trial, the court found for defendant, ruling that the plaintiffs' testimony was not credible.

Back to Page