Be Careful What You Lease For

Out of sight, but not out of mind, a former tenant was held liable for the removal of an underground storage tank (UST) he installed and subsequently left behind. New York’s Department of Environmental Conservation issued a $68,800 fine and order requiring the former tenant, not the landowner, to permanently close and remove the UST years after the tenant vacated the property. The Third Department, In re RGLL, Inc. v. Grannis, 935 N.Y.S.2d 345, agreed. The court was unmoved by petitioner’s argument that he abandoned the UST to the landlord and lacked responsibility. Although the court limited the order so that it would be applicable only to the petitioner and not to his officers, directors or employees, the court cited in part the lease clause which provided that trade fixtures do not become landlord’s property. Clearly, there are some trade fixtures landowners should avoid inheriting, particularly when environmental liability may follow suit. USTs may not be the first thing leasing lawyers think about when drafting trade fixture clauses but this clause may wind up helping the landlord escape liability.

Add a comment

Type the following characters: tango, tango, papa, mike, november, hotel

* Indicates a required field.

Subscribe

Recent Posts

Contributors

Archives

Jump to Page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.