Popular Topics
All Topics
- "Gun Jumping"
- "Test-the-Waters" communications
- 2016 SEC Agenda
- ABL
- Accelerated Filer
- Accelerated filers
- Access to Capital and Market Liquidity Report
- Accounting
- Accredited investor
- Advance Notice Bylaws
- Airbnb
- Alternative Trading Systems
- Amended Rule 15c2-11
- Annual meeting
- Annual reports
- ASC Topic 740
- Asset Management
- asset-based loan
- ATS
- Auction IPOs
- Audit committee
- Auditor attestation
- Authentication document
- Bankruptcy
- BlackRock
- Blank-check companies
- Blockchain
- blue sky
- Board committees
- Board Diversity
- Board independence
- Board of Directors
- Boilerplate
- Boilerplate in securities documents
- borrower
- Broker-dealer
- Broker-dealer registration
- Broker-dealers
- Business organizations
- Calculation of Registration Fee
- California
- California Assembly Bill 979
- Capital formation
- capital markets
- Capital raising
- CARES Act
- CEO letters
- Certified B corporation
- Chair Mary Jo White
- Chairman’s letters
- Chairperson’s letters
- Climate Change
- coal companies
- coal company IPOs
- coal miners
- coal mining
- collateral
- collateralized mortgage-backed securities "CMBS"
- Columbia Law School
- Commencement of an offering
- Compensation sharing
- Compensatory offerings
- Compensatory sales
- Compensatory securities
- Compensatory securities offerings and sales
- Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation 110.02
- conditions precedent
- conference
- Confidential filings
- Confidential information
- Confidential treatment
- Confidentiality agreements
- coronavirus
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Corporate social responsibility
- Corporate social responsibility: CSR
- Corporate Stock-Givaway Program
- covenants
- COVID-19
- credit agreement
- Crowdfunding
- CSR
- Cyber breach
- cyber incident
- Cyber risk
- Cyber-attack
- cybersecurity
- DAO
- December 31 Fiscal year end
- Decimalization
- Definition of a Security
- Delaware corporate law
- Delaware Law
- Delayed filings
- Delaying amendment
- Description of Business
- Designer stock
- Digital Advertising
- Digital securities
- Direct listings
- Direct marketing programs
- Direct response marketing
- Director Nominees
- Director Questionnaire
- Directors
- Disclosure
- Disclosure and Reporting
- Disclosure Effectiveness Initiative
- Disclosure Obligations
- Disclosure Regime
- Disclosure regulation
- Disclosure Requirements
- Disclosure Rules
- Disclosure simplification
- Disclosure updates and simplification release
- Diversity
- Dodd Frank
- Dodd-Frank Act
- Domino's Piece of the Pie Rewards
- Domino's Pizza
- Donald Trump
- Dual Class Shares
- Dual-class Capitalization
- Dual-Class Common Stock
- Dual-class shareholder voting
- Due diligence
- earnings guidance
- Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act
- EDGAR Filing Manual
- EGC
- Electronic signatures
- Emerging growth companies
- Emerging Growth Company
- Employee Practices
- engagement letter
- environment, social and governance
- Environmental, Social and Governance
- Equity Market Structure
- ESG
- event of default
- events of default
- Exchange Act
- Exchange Act Rule 12b-2
- Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11
- Exchange listing
- Exchanges
- executive compensation
- Exempt offerings
- Exempt securities offerings
- Exhibits to Registration Statement
- Expert Market
- FAST Act
- FDA
- Female
- Fictitious regulators
- Filing review comments
- financial forecasts
- Financial guidance
- Financial intermediaries
- Financial projections
- Financial sophistication
- Financial statements
- Financing Alternatives
- Finders
- Finders exception
- Finders exemption
- FINRA
- First-day pop
- Five-factor test
- Form 10-K
- Form 10-Q
- Form D
- Form NT
- Form S-1
- Form S-3
- Form S-4
- Forward-looking information
- Founder’s letters
- Fraudulent activities
- Free Stock
- Free Stock Offerings
- FTC
- General Motors Co.
- General solicitation
- general solicitation offerings
- Glass Lewis
- Global Warming
- Golden Leashes
- Greenlight Capital, Inc.
- Hart-Scott-Rodino
- HSR Act
- Impersonators of genuine firms
- Incorporation by reference
- Indications of Interest
- Influencer Marketing
- Information asymmetry
- Initial coin offering
- Initial listing requirements
- Initial public offerings
- Insider Trading
- Integration
- interest
- Interest rate system
- Interest rates
- Intrastate offerings
- Investment banking
- Investment Company Act
- Investor Advisory Committee
- Investor Alert
- IPO
- IPO disclosure
- IPO drawbacks
- IPO pricing
- IPOs
- ISS
- Item 10(b)
- Item 101
- Item 103
- Item 103 of Regulation S-K
- Item 105
- Item 401 of Regulation S-K
- Item 501(b)(7)
- Item 504 of Regulations S-K
- Item 601(b)(24) of Regulation S-K
- James Mackintosh
- JOBS Act
- Ken Langone
- Large Accelerated Filer
- Larry Fink’s 2019 letter to CEOs
- Late filings
- Law
- Legal proceedings
- lender
- LGBTQ+
- LIBOR
- line of credit
- Liquidity
- LLC
- loan agreement
- Loan Agreements
- Loan transactions
- Loans
- Loyalty Programs
- Lyft, Inc.
- MAE
- Main Street Loans
- Management
- management disclosure and analysis
- Management; Executive officers and directors
- Mark Cuban
- Material contract exhibits
- Material nonpublic information
- MD&A
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Missing filings
- Modernization
- Multi-Class Shares
- NASDAQ
- Nasdaq Independence Rules
- Nasdaq Listing Rules
- Nomination Letter
- Non-accelerated Filer
- Non-GAAP Financial Measures
- NSMIA
- NYSE
- Offering fees
- Offering proceeds
- Offering statement on Form 1-A
- Offering statement on Form C
- Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation
- Ordinary Course Covenant
- OTC
- OTC Market Group
- OTC Markets
- OTC Pink
- OTC quoted companies
- OTCQB
- Paid-for Research
- pandemic
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Pay Ratio Rule
- Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)
- Payroll Protection Program (PPP)
- perfection certificate
- Periodic reports
- Perpetual dual-class stock
- Power of Attorney
- Prescriptive-based disclosure
- Primary issuances
- Principal Executive Offices
- Principles-based disclosure
- Private Equity
- Private fund knowledgeable employees
- Private placements
- Prof. John C. Coffee, Jr.
- Proposed Rule 5605(f)
- Prospectuses
- proxy advisory firms
- Proxy Contests
- Proxy fights
- Proxy materials
- Proxy statement
- Proxy voting
- Public benefit corporation
- Public Companies
- Public company acquisitions
- Public Float
- Public M&A
- Public offerings
- Purpose & Profit
- Purpose of the corporation
- Qualified institutional buyer
- Reference interest rates
- Reg S-K
- Registered offerings
- Registered public offerings
- Registration Filing Fee
- Registration statement
- Registration statements
- Regulation A activity
- Regulation A Offerings
- Regulation A+
- Regulation Crowdfunding
- Regulation D
- Regulation FD
- Regulation of finders
- Regulation S
- Regulation S-K
- Regulation S-K Item 10(f)(1)
- Regulation S-T
- Regulations S-K
- Regulatory Entrepreneurship
- Release No. 34-90112
- Reporting Category
- representations
- resource extraction antigraft rule
- restricted stock
- Reverse mergers
- revolver
- Rights offerings
- Risk Factors
- Rule 10b-5
- Rule 10b5-1 plan
- Rule 144A
- Rule 14a-4
- Rule 163B under the Securities Act of 1933
- Rule 21F-17
- Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Rule 253(f)
- Rule 302(b)
- Rule 4(a)(2) offering
- Rule 406 under the Securities Act of 1933
- Rule 473 under the Securities Act of 1933
- Rule 483 under the Securities Act of 1933
- Rule 504 limited offerings
- Rule 506(b)
- Rule 506(c)
- Rule 701
- S&P Dow Jones
- Safe Harbor
- Safe harbor for forward-looking information
- SAFEs
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act §404(b)
- Say-on-Pay Frequency Vote
- SEC
- SEC approval of offerings
- SEC Comments
- SEC Commissioner Robert J. Jackson Jr.
- SEC disclosure
- SEC disgorgement
- SEC Division of Economics and Risk Analysis
- SEC Filing Deadlines
- SEC Filing Reviews
- SEC Form 10
- SEC Office of Investor Education and Advocacy
- SEC Release No. 33-10591
- SEC Report of Investigation
- SEC review
- SEC Rule 152
- SEC shutdown
- Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- Section 21F
- Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933
- Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- securities
- Securities & Exchange Commission
- Securities Act
- Securities Act of 1933
- Securities Act Rule 257
- Securities Act Rule 405
- Securities Act Section 17(b)
- Securities Exchange Act
- Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Securities Exchange Act Rule 12b-25
- Securities Exchange Act Section 13(a)
- Securities litigation
- Securities offerings
- securities transactions
- Severance Agreements
- Sexual harassment
- Sexual misconduct
- Shareholder Activism
- shareholder activists
- Shareholder nominations
- Shareholder rights
- Shareholder voting
- Shareholder Voting Rights
- shelter in place
- Signatures in Registration Statement
- Simple Agreement for Future Equity
- Small business
- Small-cap
- Small-cap Companies
- Small-cap Issuers
- Smaller reporting companies
- Smaller reporting company
- Snap IPO
- Social Capital Hedosophia
- Social Media
- Social Media Marketing
- SOFR
- SPAC
- SPAC's
- Special Purpose Acquisition Company
- Special situations
- Spin-offs
- Sponsorship
- Spotify
- SRC
- Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 118
- Staleness date
- Startups
- State securities laws
- stock options
- Stock Ownership Guidelines
- Stock Promotion Schemes
- Strategic spin-offs
- Sunset provisions
- Supreme Court
- Sustainability
- Switch, Inc.
- T+2
- Targeted stocks
- Tax
- Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
- Tech IPOs
- Tech M&A
- Tech unicorns
- term loan
- term sheet
- Termination or Completion of an offering
- The CLS Blue Sky Blog
- The Wall Street Journal
- Third Party Payments
- Tick Pilot
- Tick Size
- Tick Size Pilot Program
- Tick Sizes
- Token sales
- Tracking stocks
- Trade Settlement
- Trading
- trading platforms
- Transaction-based compensation
- U.S. dollar LIBOR
- U.S. federal income tax reform
- Uber Technologies, Inc.
- Underrepresented Minority
- Underwriting allocations
- Underwriting fees
- Undisclosed Fees
- Unequal Voting Rights
- Universal proxy ballots
- Unregistered finders
- Unregistered offerings
- Unregistered Soliciting Entities
- Unsolicited quotes
- Uplisting
- US Supreme Court
- Use of boilerplate
- Use of IPO proceeds
- Use of Proceeds
- venture capital
- venture capital investors
- venture capital terms
- Venture exchanges
- Verification of accredited status
- Virtual currency
- voting control
- voting power
- warranties
- Whistleblower Program
- Whistleblowers
- “Tandy” Representations
- “Testing the Waters”
Recent Posts
- The Struggle to Disclose an Issuer’s Intended Uses of Proceeds in Registered Public Offerings
- Kudos to the 2021 SEC Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation
- More than 2,000 Publicly Traded Companies Shifted to OTC’s Expert Market as Amended Rule 15c2-11 Goes into Effect
- Finding Your Post-COVID Principal Executive Offices
- The SEC Reminds Public Companies that All Filings Must Be Truthful and Complete, Even Form NTs to Extend a Periodic Report Deadline for a Few Days
- Growth Companies Should Disclose Financial Projections In IPO Prospectuses
- SEC Announces That It Will Aggressively Scrutinize Issuer’s Climate Change Disclosure
- Leadership Change at the SEC: What Activists Could Expect from Gary Gensler and the Biden Administration
- Delaware Chancery Court Provides Important Guidance on COVID-19’s Impact on a Buyer’s Obligation to Close:
- New York State Updates State Securities Regulations
Archives
- February 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
Contact Us
(212) 451-2300
www.olshanlaw.com
Negotiating Loan Documents for Borrowers – Part VI
Understanding Events of Default
Access to capital is critical to every business. Entering into loan arrangements with a lender is a complex process, the results of which can be vital to the success or failure of a company. This is the sixth in a series of articles intended to explain various aspects of the loan process. In our prior articles, we discussed the importance of the term sheet stage of a loan transaction, factors for the prospective borrower to consider in choosing a loan and the types of loans that are available, steps the borrower can take to help expedite the loan process to reduce transaction expenses and the representations and warranties and covenants sections of a loan agreement. In this article, we continue looking at the loan agreement itself by reviewing the events of default section of the document.
Events of Default
Events of default are circumstances set forth in a loan agreement, the occurrence of which entitle the lender to pursue remedies against the borrower. Events of default are intended to alert the lender to any deteriorating situation and give the lender the ability to take timely remedial action. Generally, the condition giving rise to the event of default must be continuing when the lender declares an event of default in order to exercise any of its rights set forth in the loan agreement.
While events of default will vary from one agreement to another, there are certain standard events of default that are generally included in all agreements, including payment defaults, breaches of representations, warranties or covenants, judgments, invalidity of liens, unenforceability of loan documents, change of control and insolvency or bankruptcy.
It should be noted that there is a distinction between a default and an event of default. An event of default is an event, condition, or circumstance giving a lender immediate rights under the loan agreement. A default is an event, condition or circumstance that with the passage of time would result in an event of default.
Events of default are often only generally referenced in a term sheet, resulting in the events of default section being negotiated as part of the loan agreement. Lenders typically want events of default to be defined as broadly as possible whereas borrowers will seek to define the list of events as narrowly as possible in order to continue to operate its business without undue interference and limit the circumstances that could give rise to an event of default. The ability of the borrower to negotiate less stringent events of default will depend on many factors, including the business purpose behind such request, the creditworthiness of the borrower and general market conditions.
Consequences of an Event of Default
If an event of default occurs, the lender will be permitted to exercise remedies against the borrower. Typical remedies include accelerating and demanding repayment of the loan and all other amounts owing to the lender, terminating the commitment to advance any additional funds, charging default interest and foreclosing on collateral. The exercise of such remedies can be catastrophic to a borrower as it may not have funds available to repay the loan, could result in a cross-default under other debt obligations or agreements and may result in the insolvency or bankruptcy of the borrower. Accordingly, it is imperative for the borrower to have a strong culture of compliance in its organization to avoid inadvertently triggering an event of default.
It does not matter which event of default is breached. Whether it is a missed payment, the failure to deliver a required financial report or a significant judgment decided against the borrower, any event of default will trigger the lender’s enforcement remedies. In practice, however, lenders make a distinction because lenders generally do not want to be viewed by the borrower or the courts as being unreasonable or as acting in bad faith. Rather, absent other extenuating circumstances, a lender is more likely to use a minor default as an opportunity to bring the borrower back to the negotiating table rather than exercise more extreme remedies.
If a borrower believes that an event of default is likely to occur, the borrower should discuss the situation with the lender in advance in order to seek an amendment or a waiver. A lender is likely to be more receptive to assist in working towards a resolution prior to the occurrence of an event of default as most lenders would prefer to have a performing loan rather than being involved in a restructuring transaction or foreclosing on collateral as such extreme outcomes are expensive and time consuming and can remove control from the lender making the outcome uncertain. Borrowers should note that, if the lender is willing to grant such an amendment or a waiver, it typically comes at a financial cost to the borrower or requires some concessions from the borrower.
As the consequences of an event of default can be severe, the borrower should review the events of default section carefully and ensure that it will be able to comply with such terms, particularly as it relates to the borrower’s plans for its business during the term of the loan.
Drafting Suggestions
Careful attention should be paid to the definitions section of the loan agreement and the impact that such definitions have on the events of default section. The borrower may seek to modify certain definitions in order to provide more flexibility with respect to its compliance with the applicable covenants or conditions in order to avoid actions that result in an event of default.
It is critical for the borrower to understand who will be subject to the items described in the events of default section. Often, these items will apply not just to the borrower, but also to its direct and indirect subsidiaries.
The borrower should request materiality qualifiers and reasonable thresholds or other de minimis exceptions before certain circumstances rise to the level of an event of default to avoid immaterial events resulting in unintended consequences. In addition, in some cases it may be more appropriate for a particular event of default to only apply where it will have or is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect, rather than refer to materiality or a monetary threshold.
The borrower should try to avoid including any items in the events of default section that are beyond its control. For example, the borrower should try to omit from the events of default section the termination of service of a particular employee or the loss of a particular customer.
The borrower should seek to include cure periods should a default occur so that it has an opportunity to cure its breach before it triggers an event of default. Depending on the default, cure periods of 10 to 30 days are customary, other than for payment defaults for which up to 5 days is customary. Often, lenders are willing to provide cure periods for interest payments, but not for principal payments. Ideally, any cure period would not apply until the borrower has been notified by the lender of the default. However, lenders have become increasingly reluctant to provide such a notice provision reasoning that it is the borrower’s responsibility to be aware of any default. In addition, lenders will not provide cure periods for certain defaults that are the result of an action affirmatively taken by the borrower such as a voluntary bankruptcy filing.
Finally, for defaults not capable of being cured within a specified cure period, borrowers should request a “continuing cure” right such that so long as the borrower is actively attempting to cure such default, the borrower shall not be deemed in default for such breach. Such “continuing cure” rights are typically subject to an outside cutoff date of 60 to 90 days.
Conclusion
Debt financing can be vital to the ongoing operations of a business and a powerful expansion tool, but a borrower must remain wary of pitfalls within the loan documents that can interfere with its business. Careful attention during the drafting stage of the loan agreement can prevent unexpected consequences in the future. Borrowers and prospective borrowers are encouraged to work with their legal and financial advisors throughout the negotiation and drafting stages of the loan process as their involvement can help to ensure smooth and efficient operations of the borrower’s business and avoid catastrophic consequences during the term of the loan.