Popular Topics
All Topics
- "Gun Jumping"
- "Test-the-Waters" communications
- 2016 SEC Agenda
- ABL
- Accelerated Filer
- Accelerated filers
- Access to Capital and Market Liquidity Report
- Accounting
- Accredited investor
- Advance Notice Bylaws
- Airbnb
- Alternative Trading Systems
- Annual meeting
- Annual reports
- ASC Topic 740
- Asset Management
- asset-based loan
- ATS
- Auction IPOs
- Audit committee
- Auditor attestation
- Authentication document
- BlackRock
- Blank-check companies
- Blockchain
- blue sky
- Board committees
- Board Diversity
- Board independence
- Board of Directors
- Boilerplate
- Boilerplate in securities documents
- borrower
- Broker-dealer
- Broker-dealer registration
- Broker-dealers
- Calculation of Registration Fee
- California
- California Assembly Bill 979
- Capital formation
- capital markets
- Capital raising
- CEO letters
- Certified B corporation
- Chair Mary Jo White
- Chairman’s letters
- Chairperson’s letters
- Climate Change
- coal companies
- coal company IPOs
- coal miners
- coal mining
- collateral
- Columbia Law School
- Commencement of an offering
- Compensation sharing
- Compensatory offerings
- Compensatory sales
- Compensatory securities
- Compensatory securities offerings and sales
- Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation 110.02
- conditions precedent
- conference
- Confidential filings
- Confidential information
- Confidential treatment
- Confidentiality agreements
- coronavirus
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Corporate social responsibility
- Corporate social responsibility: CSR
- Corporate Stock-Givaway Program
- covenants
- COVID-19
- credit agreement
- Crowdfunding
- CSR
- Cyber breach
- cyber incident
- Cyber risk
- Cyber-attack
- cybersecurity
- DAO
- December 31 Fiscal year end
- Decimalization
- Definition of a Security
- Delaware corporate law
- Delaware Law
- Delaying amendment
- Description of Business
- Designer stock
- Digital Advertising
- Digital securities
- Direct listings
- Direct marketing programs
- Direct response marketing
- Director Nominees
- Director Questionnaire
- Directors
- Disclosure
- Disclosure and Reporting
- Disclosure Effectiveness Initiative
- Disclosure Obligations
- Disclosure Regime
- Disclosure regulation
- Disclosure Requirements
- Disclosure Rules
- Disclosure simplification
- Disclosure updates and simplification release
- Diversity
- Dodd Frank
- Dodd-Frank Act
- Domino's Piece of the Pie Rewards
- Domino's Pizza
- Donald Trump
- Dual Class Shares
- Dual-class Capitalization
- Dual-Class Common Stock
- Dual-class shareholder voting
- Due diligence
- earnings guidance
- Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act
- EDGAR Filing Manual
- EGC
- Electronic signatures
- Emerging growth companies
- Emerging Growth Company
- engagement letter
- environment, social and governance
- Equity Market Structure
- ESG
- event of default
- events of default
- Exchange Act
- Exchange Act Rule 12b-2
- Exchange listing
- Exchanges
- executive compensation
- Exempt offerings
- Exempt securities offerings
- Exhibits to Registration Statement
- FAST Act
- FDA
- Female
- Fictitious regulators
- Filing review comments
- financial forecasts
- Financial intermediaries
- Financial sophistication
- Financial statements
- Financing Alternatives
- Finders
- Finders exception
- Finders exemption
- FINRA
- First-day pop
- Five-factor test
- Form 10-K
- Form 10-Q
- Form D
- Form S-1
- Form S-3
- Form S-4
- Founder’s letters
- Fraudulent activities
- Free Stock
- Free Stock Offerings
- FTC
- General Motors Co.
- General solicitation
- Glass Lewis
- Golden Leashes
- Greenlight Capital, Inc.
- Hart-Scott-Rodino
- HSR Act
- Impersonators of genuine firms
- Incorporation by reference
- Indications of Interest
- Influencer Marketing
- Information asymmetry
- Initial coin offering
- Initial listing requirements
- Initial public offerings
- Insider Trading
- Integration
- interest
- Interest rate system
- Interest rates
- Intrastate offerings
- Investment banking
- Investment Company Act
- Investor Advisory Committee
- Investor Alert
- IPO
- IPO disclosure
- IPO drawbacks
- IPO pricing
- IPOs
- ISS
- Item 101
- Item 103
- Item 103 of Regulation S-K
- Item 105
- Item 401 of Regulation S-K
- Item 501(b)(7)
- Item 601(b)(24) of Regulation S-K
- James Mackintosh
- JOBS Act
- Ken Langone
- Large Accelerated Filer
- Larry Fink’s 2019 letter to CEOs
- Legal proceedings
- lender
- LGBTQ+
- LIBOR
- line of credit
- loan agreement
- Loan Agreements
- Loan transactions
- Loans
- Loyalty Programs
- Lyft, Inc.
- MAE
- Management
- management disclosure and analysis
- Management; Executive officers and directors
- Mark Cuban
- Material contract exhibits
- Material nonpublic information
- MD&A
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Modernization
- Multi-Class Shares
- NASDAQ
- Nasdaq Independence Rules
- Nasdaq Listing Rules
- Nomination Letter
- Non-accelerated Filer
- Non-GAAP Financial Measures
- NSMIA
- NYSE
- Offering fees
- Offering statement on Form 1-A
- Offering statement on Form C
- Ordinary Course Covenant
- OTC
- OTC Market Group
- OTC Pink
- OTC quoted companies
- OTCQB
- Paid-for Research
- pandemic
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Pay Ratio Rule
- perfection certificate
- Periodic reports
- Perpetual dual-class stock
- Power of Attorney
- Prescriptive-based disclosure
- Primary issuances
- Principal Executive Offices
- Principles-based disclosure
- Private Equity
- Private fund knowledgeable employees
- Private placements
- Prof. John C. Coffee, Jr.
- Proposed Rule 5605(f)
- Prospectuses
- proxy advisory firms
- Proxy Contests
- Proxy fights
- Proxy materials
- Proxy statement
- Proxy voting
- Public benefit corporation
- Public Companies
- Public company acquisitions
- Public Float
- Public M&A
- Public offerings
- Purpose & Profit
- Purpose of the corporation
- Qualified institutional buyer
- Reference interest rates
- Reg S-K
- Registered offerings
- Registration Filing Fee
- Registration statement
- Registration statements
- Regulation A activity
- Regulation A+
- Regulation Crowdfunding
- Regulation D
- Regulation FD
- Regulation of finders
- Regulation S
- Regulation S-K
- Regulation S-K Item 10(f)(1)
- Regulation S-T
- Regulations S-K
- Regulatory Entrepreneurship
- Release No. 34-90112
- Reporting Category
- representations
- resource extraction antigraft rule
- restricted stock
- Reverse mergers
- revolver
- Rights offerings
- Risk Factors
- Rule 10b-5
- Rule 10b5-1 plan
- Rule 144A
- Rule 14a-4
- Rule 163B under the Securities Act of 1933
- Rule 21F-17
- Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Rule 253(f)
- Rule 302(b)
- Rule 4(a)(2) offering
- Rule 406 under the Securities Act of 1933
- Rule 473 under the Securities Act of 1933
- Rule 483 under the Securities Act of 1933
- Rule 506(b)
- Rule 506(c)
- Rule 701
- S&P Dow Jones
- Safe Harbor
- SAFEs
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act §404(b)
- Say-on-Pay Frequency Vote
- SEC
- SEC approval of offerings
- SEC Comments
- SEC Commissioner Robert J. Jackson Jr.
- SEC disclosure
- SEC disgorgement
- SEC Division of Economics and Risk Analysis
- SEC Filing Deadlines
- SEC Filing Reviews
- SEC Form 10
- SEC Office of Investor Education and Advocacy
- SEC Release No. 33-10591
- SEC Report of Investigation
- SEC Rule 152
- SEC shutdown
- Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- Section 21F
- Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- securities
- Securities & Exchange Commission
- Securities Act
- Securities Act of 1933
- Securities Act Rule 257
- Securities Act Rule 405
- Securities Act Section 17(b)
- Securities Exchange Act
- Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Securities litigation
- Securities offerings
- securities transactions
- Severance Agreements
- Sexual harassment
- Sexual misconduct
- Shareholder Activism
- shareholder activists
- Shareholder nominations
- Shareholder rights
- Shareholder voting
- Shareholder Voting Rights
- Signatures in Registration Statement
- Simple Agreement for Future Equity
- Small business
- Small-cap
- Small-cap Companies
- Small-cap Issuers
- Smaller reporting companies
- Smaller reporting company
- Snap IPO
- Social Capital Hedosophia
- Social Media
- Social Media Marketing
- SOFR
- SPAC
- SPAC's
- Special Purpose Acquisition Company
- Special situations
- Spin-offs
- Sponsorship
- Spotify
- SRC
- Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 118
- Staleness date
- Startups
- State securities laws
- stock options
- Stock Ownership Guidelines
- Stock Promotion Schemes
- Strategic spin-offs
- Sunset provisions
- Supreme Court
- Sustainability
- Switch, Inc.
- T+2
- Targeted stocks
- Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
- Tech IPOs
- Tech M&A
- Tech unicorns
- term loan
- term sheet
- Termination or Completion of an offering
- The CLS Blue Sky Blog
- The Wall Street Journal
- Third Party Payments
- Tick Pilot
- Tick Size
- Tick Size Pilot Program
- Tick Sizes
- Token sales
- Tracking stocks
- Trade Settlement
- Trading
- trading platforms
- Transaction-based compensation
- U.S. dollar LIBOR
- U.S. federal income tax reform
- Uber Technologies, Inc.
- Underrepresented Minority
- Underwriting allocations
- Underwriting fees
- Undisclosed Fees
- Unequal Voting Rights
- Universal proxy ballots
- Unregistered finders
- Unregistered offerings
- Unregistered Soliciting Entities
- Uplisting
- US Supreme Court
- Use of boilerplate
- venture capital
- venture capital investors
- venture capital terms
- Venture exchanges
- Verification of accredited status
- Virtual currency
- voting control
- voting power
- warranties
- Whistleblower Program
- Whistleblowers
- “Tandy” Representations
- “Testing the Waters”
Recent Posts
- Delaware Chancery Court Provides Important Guidance on COVID-19’s Impact on a Buyer’s Obligation to Close:
- New York State Updates State Securities Regulations
- Nasdaq Proposes New Listing Rules Related to Board Diversity
- SEC Adopts Amendments to Permit the Use of Electronic Signatures for SEC Filings
- The SEC Rebuilds the Integration Principles Guiding Concurrent Private and Public Offerings of Securities
- The SEC Proposes a Safe Harbor for Permissible Capital-Raising Activities by Unregistered Finders
- SEC Issues 100th Whistleblower Award Just Days after Adopting Amendments to Whistleblower Program
- SEC Reduces Registration Filing Fee Beginning in October 2020
- The SEC Amends Regulation S-K Disclosure Rules to Empower Companies to Determine What and How Much Disclosure is Appropriate for Shareholders and Investors
- Negotiating Loan Documents for Borrowers – Part VI
Archives
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
Contact Us
(212) 451-2300
www.olshanlaw.com
Negotiating Loan Documents for Borrowers – Part V
Understanding Covenants
Access to capital is critical to every business. Entering into loan arrangements with a lender is a complex process, the results of which can be vital to the success or failure of a company. This is the fifth in a series of articles intended to explain various aspects of the loan process. In our prior articles, we discussed the importance of the term sheet stage of a loan transaction, factors for the prospective borrower to consider in choosing a loan and the types of loans that are available, steps the borrower can take to help expedite the loan process to reduce transaction expenses and the representations and warranties section of a loan agreement. In this article, we continue looking at the loan agreement itself by reviewing the affirmative, negative and financial covenants sections of the document.
What are Covenants?
A covenant is a promise or agreement to do or not do a particular thing. In the context of a loan agreement, the covenants are basically the things the borrower is either required to do or restricted from doing during the term of the loan.
Covenants are often only loosely referenced in a term sheet, resulting in the covenant section and related definitions being among the most heavily negotiated portion of the loan agreement. Lenders typically want covenants to be as restrictive as possible whereas borrowers will seek flexibility in order to operate its business without undue interference. The ability of the borrower to negotiate less stringent covenants will depend on many factors, including the business purpose of the request, the creditworthiness of the borrower and general market conditions.
Affirmative, negative and financial covenants are each typically found in their own section of a loan agreement, although some loan agreement will combine all covenants into one section. Borrowers are also cautioned to review ancillary documents carefully as covenants may also be found in other agreements such as security agreements and pledge agreements.
Impact of Covenants on the Borrower
In a loan agreement, a borrower’s breach of a covenant will generally constitute an event of default, the consequences of which include that the lender can declare the loan immediately due and payable and enforce any security interests.
Covenants that restrict the ability of the borrower from engaging in its desired business operations will either result in a default under the loan agreement or require the borrower to seek an amendment or waiver from the lender. Even if the lender is willing to grant such an amendment or a waiver, it typically comes at a financial cost to the borrower or requires some concessions from the borrower.
As the consequences of a breach of a covenant are severe, the borrower should read each covenant carefully and ensure that it will be able to comply with such terms, particularly as it relates to the borrower’s plans for its business during the term of the loan.
Affirmative Covenants
Affirmative covenants in a loan agreement are things the borrower promises to do during the term of the loan. These remain obligations until the loan is repaid. From the borrower’s perspective, the affirmative covenants should not require the borrower to do anything that it is not already doing. From the lender’s perspective, affirmative covenants are designed to (i) ensure the lender receives sufficient information to monitor the borrower’s continuing compliance with all of its obligations under the loan agreement, (ii) confirm that the borrower continues to operate its business consistent with industry standards and its own past practices, and (iii) make certain that the borrower is able to repay the loan. Examples of affirmative covenants include promises to deliver financial statements to the lender, pay taxes, maintain insurance and take the necessary steps to preserve the borrower’s legal existence.
Negative Covenants
Negative covenants in a loan agreement are things the borrower promises to refrain from doing during the term of the loan. These remain obligations until the loan is repaid. From the borrower’s perspective, the negative covenants should not prohibit the borrower from doing the things that it currently does and what it wants to do in the future. From the lender’s perspective, negative covenants are designed to (i) establish guidelines for the borrower in operating its business, (ii) ensure the borrower’s ability to repay its loans, and (iii) protect the lender’s priority with respect to its security interest in its collateral and that the borrower does not take any actions that may impair the lender’s security interest in any collateral. When reviewing negative covenants, special attention should be given to the interplay between different negative covenants as an action that is permitted by one covenant may be prohibited by another covenant. Examples of negative covenants include restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness or liens, prohibitions on pledging the borrower’s assets, limitations on the borrower’s ability to sell assets or make acquisitions and constraints on the borrower’s ability to declare dividends or make distributions to its equity holders.
Financial Covenants
Financial covenants measure the financial health of a borrower by reference to a range of metrics. The most common financial covenants are designed to measure a borrower’s cash flow, leverage, liquidity and net worth. There are two types of financial covenants: incurrence covenants and maintenance covenants. Incurrence covenants prohibit a borrower from taking certain actions, such as making acquisitions or paying dividends, unless the financial covenant is satisfied. These covenants are measured at the time of the desired action. Incurrence covenants are usually measured on a pro forma basis taking into account the effect of the proposed action. Failure to satisfy an incurrence covenant will preclude the borrower from taking the desired action, but will not, by itself, result in a default. Maintenance covenants are tested periodically, usually on a quarterly or annual basis. Maintenance covenants serve as an early warning sign for the lender about impending trouble with the borrower’s financial health and provide the lender with an opportunity to potentially restructure the loan before the borrower finds itself in a bankruptcy situation. A breach of a maintenance covenant on the date it is tested will result in an event of default, unless it is able to be cured. To protect the borrower against cyclical changes, maintenance covenants are typically measured on a trailing twelve month or trailing four quarter basis. In circumstances where the borrower’s projections include reducing its leverage ratio over the term of the loan, either through amortization or excess cash flow sweeps, the borrower may be able to negotiate appropriate periodic step ups or step downs in the financial covenants.
Drafting Suggestions
Covenants are frequently drafted by lender’s counsel as unqualified statements. One way to limit the scope of a covenant is to request a materiality qualifier to protect the borrower from an immaterial breach.
Careful attention should be paid to the definitions section of the loan agreement and the impact that such definitions have on the covenants section. The borrower may seek to modify certain definitions in order to provide more flexibility with respect to its compliance with the applicable covenants.
It is critical for the borrower to understand who will be subject to the covenants. Often, the covenants will apply not just to the borrower, but also to its direct and indirect subsidiaries. While this is intended to protect the lender’s ability to be repaid, the borrower should ensure that transactions between it and its subsidiaries are not unduly restricted, particularly where such transactions do not impact upon the lender’s security interest in the collateral. Lenders will sometimes permit certain subsidiaries to be deemed unrestricted subsidiaries. Such subsidiaries will be exempt from complying with the covenants in the loan agreement. However, such unrestricted subsidiaries will also usually be precluded from receiving any of the loan proceeds and their financial performance will be excluded from the calculation of the financial covenants.
For negative covenants, it is common to build in exceptions to the general restrictions such as certain permitted liens or certain permitted debt that are incurred in the ordinary course of business. When reviewing the covenants section, the borrower needs to consider its current as well as projected operations and build in the necessary exceptions to the covenants that will allow it to operate its business without running afoul of the covenants.
Finally, borrowers should seek to include cure periods in the event of a breach of a covenant so that it has an opportunity to cure its breach before it triggers an event of default. Depending on the covenant, cure periods of 10 to 30 days are customary, other than for payment defaults for which up to 5 days is customary. For financial covenants, the borrower may wish to seek a right to cure breaches of such covenants by the injection of equity. The lender may be amenable to permitting this equity cure but will typically want to control the amount and frequency of any such cash injections.
Conclusion
Debt financing can be vital to the ongoing operations of a business and a powerful expansion tool, but a borrower must remain wary of pitfalls within the loan documents that can interfere with its business. Careful attention during the drafting stage of the loan agreement can prevent unexpected consequences in the future. Borrowers and prospective borrowers are encouraged to work with their legal and financial advisors throughout the negotiation and drafting stages of the loan process as their involvement can help to ensure smooth and efficient operations of the borrower’s business during the term of the loan.