Popular Topics
All Topics
- "Gun Jumping"
- "Test-the-Waters" communications
- 2016 SEC Agenda
- ABL
- Accelerated Filer
- Accelerated filers
- Access to Capital and Market Liquidity Report
- Accounting
- Accredited investor
- Advance Notice Bylaws
- Airbnb
- Alternative Trading Systems
- Annual meeting
- Annual reports
- ASC Topic 740
- Asset Management
- asset-based loan
- ATS
- Auction IPOs
- Audit committee
- Auditor attestation
- Authentication document
- BlackRock
- Blank-check companies
- Blockchain
- blue sky
- Board committees
- Board Diversity
- Board independence
- Board of Directors
- Boilerplate
- Boilerplate in securities documents
- borrower
- Broker-dealer
- Broker-dealer registration
- Broker-dealers
- Calculation of Registration Fee
- California
- California Assembly Bill 979
- Capital formation
- capital markets
- Capital raising
- CEO letters
- Certified B corporation
- Chair Mary Jo White
- Chairman’s letters
- Chairperson’s letters
- Climate Change
- coal companies
- coal company IPOs
- coal miners
- coal mining
- collateral
- Columbia Law School
- Commencement of an offering
- Compensation sharing
- Compensatory offerings
- Compensatory sales
- Compensatory securities
- Compensatory securities offerings and sales
- Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation 110.02
- conditions precedent
- conference
- Confidential filings
- Confidential information
- Confidential treatment
- Confidentiality agreements
- coronavirus
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Corporate social responsibility
- Corporate social responsibility: CSR
- Corporate Stock-Givaway Program
- covenants
- COVID-19
- credit agreement
- Crowdfunding
- CSR
- Cyber breach
- cyber incident
- Cyber risk
- Cyber-attack
- cybersecurity
- DAO
- December 31 Fiscal year end
- Decimalization
- Definition of a Security
- Delaware corporate law
- Delaware Law
- Delaying amendment
- Description of Business
- Designer stock
- Digital Advertising
- Digital securities
- Direct listings
- Direct marketing programs
- Direct response marketing
- Director Nominees
- Director Questionnaire
- Directors
- Disclosure
- Disclosure and Reporting
- Disclosure Effectiveness Initiative
- Disclosure Obligations
- Disclosure Regime
- Disclosure regulation
- Disclosure Requirements
- Disclosure Rules
- Disclosure simplification
- Disclosure updates and simplification release
- Diversity
- Dodd Frank
- Dodd-Frank Act
- Domino's Piece of the Pie Rewards
- Domino's Pizza
- Donald Trump
- Dual Class Shares
- Dual-class Capitalization
- Dual-Class Common Stock
- Dual-class shareholder voting
- Due diligence
- earnings guidance
- Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act
- EDGAR Filing Manual
- EGC
- Electronic signatures
- Emerging growth companies
- Emerging Growth Company
- engagement letter
- environment, social and governance
- Environmental, Social and Governance
- Equity Market Structure
- ESG
- event of default
- events of default
- Exchange Act
- Exchange Act Rule 12b-2
- Exchange listing
- Exchanges
- executive compensation
- Exempt offerings
- Exempt securities offerings
- Exhibits to Registration Statement
- FAST Act
- FDA
- Female
- Fictitious regulators
- Filing review comments
- financial forecasts
- Financial intermediaries
- Financial sophistication
- Financial statements
- Financing Alternatives
- Finders
- Finders exception
- Finders exemption
- FINRA
- First-day pop
- Five-factor test
- Form 10-K
- Form 10-Q
- Form D
- Form S-1
- Form S-3
- Form S-4
- Founder’s letters
- Fraudulent activities
- Free Stock
- Free Stock Offerings
- FTC
- General Motors Co.
- General solicitation
- Glass Lewis
- Global Warming
- Golden Leashes
- Greenlight Capital, Inc.
- Hart-Scott-Rodino
- HSR Act
- Impersonators of genuine firms
- Incorporation by reference
- Indications of Interest
- Influencer Marketing
- Information asymmetry
- Initial coin offering
- Initial listing requirements
- Initial public offerings
- Insider Trading
- Integration
- interest
- Interest rate system
- Interest rates
- Intrastate offerings
- Investment banking
- Investment Company Act
- Investor Advisory Committee
- Investor Alert
- IPO
- IPO disclosure
- IPO drawbacks
- IPO pricing
- IPOs
- ISS
- Item 101
- Item 103
- Item 103 of Regulation S-K
- Item 105
- Item 401 of Regulation S-K
- Item 501(b)(7)
- Item 601(b)(24) of Regulation S-K
- James Mackintosh
- JOBS Act
- Ken Langone
- Large Accelerated Filer
- Larry Fink’s 2019 letter to CEOs
- Legal proceedings
- lender
- LGBTQ+
- LIBOR
- line of credit
- loan agreement
- Loan Agreements
- Loan transactions
- Loans
- Loyalty Programs
- Lyft, Inc.
- MAE
- Management
- management disclosure and analysis
- Management; Executive officers and directors
- Mark Cuban
- Material contract exhibits
- Material nonpublic information
- MD&A
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Modernization
- Multi-Class Shares
- NASDAQ
- Nasdaq Independence Rules
- Nasdaq Listing Rules
- Nomination Letter
- Non-accelerated Filer
- Non-GAAP Financial Measures
- NSMIA
- NYSE
- Offering fees
- Offering statement on Form 1-A
- Offering statement on Form C
- Ordinary Course Covenant
- OTC
- OTC Market Group
- OTC Pink
- OTC quoted companies
- OTCQB
- Paid-for Research
- pandemic
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Pay Ratio Rule
- perfection certificate
- Periodic reports
- Perpetual dual-class stock
- Power of Attorney
- Prescriptive-based disclosure
- Primary issuances
- Principal Executive Offices
- Principles-based disclosure
- Private Equity
- Private fund knowledgeable employees
- Private placements
- Prof. John C. Coffee, Jr.
- Proposed Rule 5605(f)
- Prospectuses
- proxy advisory firms
- Proxy Contests
- Proxy fights
- Proxy materials
- Proxy statement
- Proxy voting
- Public benefit corporation
- Public Companies
- Public company acquisitions
- Public Float
- Public M&A
- Public offerings
- Purpose & Profit
- Purpose of the corporation
- Qualified institutional buyer
- Reference interest rates
- Reg S-K
- Registered offerings
- Registration Filing Fee
- Registration statement
- Registration statements
- Regulation A activity
- Regulation A+
- Regulation Crowdfunding
- Regulation D
- Regulation FD
- Regulation of finders
- Regulation S
- Regulation S-K
- Regulation S-K Item 10(f)(1)
- Regulation S-T
- Regulations S-K
- Regulatory Entrepreneurship
- Release No. 34-90112
- Reporting Category
- representations
- resource extraction antigraft rule
- restricted stock
- Reverse mergers
- revolver
- Rights offerings
- Risk Factors
- Rule 10b-5
- Rule 10b5-1 plan
- Rule 144A
- Rule 14a-4
- Rule 163B under the Securities Act of 1933
- Rule 21F-17
- Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Rule 253(f)
- Rule 302(b)
- Rule 4(a)(2) offering
- Rule 406 under the Securities Act of 1933
- Rule 473 under the Securities Act of 1933
- Rule 483 under the Securities Act of 1933
- Rule 506(b)
- Rule 506(c)
- Rule 701
- S&P Dow Jones
- Safe Harbor
- SAFEs
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act §404(b)
- Say-on-Pay Frequency Vote
- SEC
- SEC approval of offerings
- SEC Comments
- SEC Commissioner Robert J. Jackson Jr.
- SEC disclosure
- SEC disgorgement
- SEC Division of Economics and Risk Analysis
- SEC Filing Deadlines
- SEC Filing Reviews
- SEC Form 10
- SEC Office of Investor Education and Advocacy
- SEC Release No. 33-10591
- SEC Report of Investigation
- SEC Rule 152
- SEC shutdown
- Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- Section 21F
- Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
- securities
- Securities & Exchange Commission
- Securities Act
- Securities Act of 1933
- Securities Act Rule 257
- Securities Act Rule 405
- Securities Act Section 17(b)
- Securities Exchange Act
- Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Securities litigation
- Securities offerings
- securities transactions
- Severance Agreements
- Sexual harassment
- Sexual misconduct
- Shareholder Activism
- shareholder activists
- Shareholder nominations
- Shareholder rights
- Shareholder voting
- Shareholder Voting Rights
- Signatures in Registration Statement
- Simple Agreement for Future Equity
- Small business
- Small-cap
- Small-cap Companies
- Small-cap Issuers
- Smaller reporting companies
- Smaller reporting company
- Snap IPO
- Social Capital Hedosophia
- Social Media
- Social Media Marketing
- SOFR
- SPAC
- SPAC's
- Special Purpose Acquisition Company
- Special situations
- Spin-offs
- Sponsorship
- Spotify
- SRC
- Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 118
- Staleness date
- Startups
- State securities laws
- stock options
- Stock Ownership Guidelines
- Stock Promotion Schemes
- Strategic spin-offs
- Sunset provisions
- Supreme Court
- Sustainability
- Switch, Inc.
- T+2
- Targeted stocks
- Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
- Tech IPOs
- Tech M&A
- Tech unicorns
- term loan
- term sheet
- Termination or Completion of an offering
- The CLS Blue Sky Blog
- The Wall Street Journal
- Third Party Payments
- Tick Pilot
- Tick Size
- Tick Size Pilot Program
- Tick Sizes
- Token sales
- Tracking stocks
- Trade Settlement
- Trading
- trading platforms
- Transaction-based compensation
- U.S. dollar LIBOR
- U.S. federal income tax reform
- Uber Technologies, Inc.
- Underrepresented Minority
- Underwriting allocations
- Underwriting fees
- Undisclosed Fees
- Unequal Voting Rights
- Universal proxy ballots
- Unregistered finders
- Unregistered offerings
- Unregistered Soliciting Entities
- Uplisting
- US Supreme Court
- Use of boilerplate
- venture capital
- venture capital investors
- venture capital terms
- Venture exchanges
- Verification of accredited status
- Virtual currency
- voting control
- voting power
- warranties
- Whistleblower Program
- Whistleblowers
- “Tandy” Representations
- “Testing the Waters”
Recent Posts
- SEC Announces That It Will Aggressively Scrutinize Issuer’s Climate Change Disclosure
- Leadership Change at the SEC: What Activists Could Expect from Gary Gensler and the Biden Administration
- Delaware Chancery Court Provides Important Guidance on COVID-19’s Impact on a Buyer’s Obligation to Close:
- New York State Updates State Securities Regulations
- Nasdaq Proposes New Listing Rules Related to Board Diversity
- SEC Adopts Amendments to Permit the Use of Electronic Signatures for SEC Filings
- The SEC Rebuilds the Integration Principles Guiding Concurrent Private and Public Offerings of Securities
- The SEC Proposes a Safe Harbor for Permissible Capital-Raising Activities by Unregistered Finders
- SEC Reduces Registration Filing Fee Beginning in October 2020
Archives
- March 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
Contact Us
(212) 451-2300
www.olshanlaw.com
SEC Issues 100th Whistleblower Award Just Days after Adopting Amendments to Whistleblower Program
The New Rules are Designed to Add Clarity, Efficiency and Transparency to the SEC’s Already Successful Whistleblower Award Program
100th Whistleblower Award
On September 28, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it awarded $1.8 million to an unnamed “company outsider,” representing the 100th whistleblower award granted to an individual in the history of the SEC’s whistleblower program. The whistleblower received the award for reporting significant information to the SEC about ongoing securities law violations that resulted in a successful enforcement action. With additional awards reported by the SEC on September 30 2020, the SEC whistleblower program made a total of 39 awards during its fiscal year. Despite the challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, the SEC processed more claims than in any previous year.
With this latest award, the SEC’s whistleblower program has now paid more than $562 million to 106 whistleblowers under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act passed in 2010. All payments are made out of an investor protection fund established by Congress that is financed through monetary sanctions paid to the SEC by securities law violators. No money has been taken or withheld from harmed investors to pay whistleblower awards.
Congress established the whistleblower program to incentivize whistleblowers with specific, timely and credible information about federal securities law violations to report such improprieties to the SEC. The whistleblower program has proven to be successful in generating high-quality information regarding securities laws violations that have enabled the SEC to terminate fraud schemes and protect investors. Since the program’s inception, enforcement actions resulting from whistleblower tips have resulted in orders for more than $2.5 billion in financial remedies, much of which has been, or is scheduled to be, returned to harmed investors.
New Whistleblower Program Rules
On September 23, 2020, the SEC issued a press release announcing that it voted to adopt amendments to the rules governing its whistleblower program, which were first proposed in June 2018, that are designed to provide greater clarity to whistleblowers and increase the program’s transparency and efficiency. The goal of the amendments is to ensure that whistleblowers are properly incentivized, and to continue to properly award whistleblowers to the maximum extent appropriate and with maximum efficiency or, as SEC Chairman Jay Clayton said, “[the] rule amendments will help us get more money into the hands of whistleblowers, and at a faster pace”. In addition, the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower published guidance regarding the process for determining award amounts for eligible whistleblowers.
Congress mandated the SEC’s whistleblower program in July 2010 by adding Section 21F to the Exchange Act, which, among other things, directs the SEC to pay awards to whistleblowers who voluntarily provide the SEC with original information about a violation of the securities laws that leads to the successful enforcement of a covered judicial or administrative action. Awards range from 10 percent to 30 percent of the monetary sanctions collected in excess of $1 million. Rule 21F-6 sets forth the criteria for determining the amount of the award. Positive award criteria justifying a higher award include the significance of the information provided, the assistance provided by the whistleblower, the law-enforcement interest in deterring the underlying violations, and the participation of the whistleblower in the culpable entity’s internal compliance and reporting system. Negative factors that could lower an award include culpability of the whistleblower, unreasonable delay in reporting the securities law violations, and interfering with the entity’s internal compliance and reporting systems.
Pursuant to the amendments, whistleblowers with potential awards of less than $5 million, which historically have represented nearly 75% of all whistleblower awards, subject to certain criteria, will qualify for a presumption that they will receive the maximum statutory award amount where none of the negative factors are present. In addition to providing potential whistleblowers with greater transparency and certainty, this presumption is intended to increase efficiency in the award review process.
Additional amendments include:
• Allowing awards based on deferred prosecution agreements or non-prosecution agreement entered into by the U.S. Department of Justice or a settlement agreement entered into by the SEC outside of a judicial or administrative setting to address violations of securities laws and clarifying that any money required to be paid under such an agreement is a “monetary sanction” for purposes of calculating an award;
• Clarifying the definition of “related action” to make clear that recovery for law-enforcement or separate regulatory actions that do not qualify as “related actions” is not available where the SEC determines that there is a separate award scheme that more appropriately applies to such action;
• Clarifying the SEC’s broad discretion when applying the award factors in Rule 21F-6and setting award amounts, including the discretion to consider the award factors in percentage terms, dollar terms or some combination thereof; and
• Revising the SEC’s definition of “whistleblower” in light of the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somer to specify that in order to qualify as a whistleblower, a person must provide information to the SEC in writing before experiencing any retaliation;
• Barring applicants who submit materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements in their whistleblower submission, in their other dealings with the SEC, or in related actions and providing the SEC with the ability to permanently bar any applicant from seeking an award after the SEC determines that the applicant has abused the process by submitting three frivolous award applications.
In addition to the foregoing amendments, the SEC adopted several other amendments to its whistleblower rules, as well as interpretive guidance, intended to clarify and enhance certain policies, practices, and procedures in implementing the whistleblower program. A proposed soft-cap on larger award amounts was not adopted by the SEC.
The amendments are not without controversy. The SEC’s position that it has discretion to reduce the largest whistleblower awards based upon their size has generated substantial opposition from the plaintiffs’ bar and within the SEC, which approved the amendments by a vote of three to two. First introduced two years ago, the vote on the amendments finally came to fruition after being postponed twice previously while the commissioners attempted to reach agreement. Critics, including the two dissenting Democratic commissioners, contend that the amendments will dissuade potential whistleblowers from reporting violations of the securities laws by potentially reducing awards and requiring written reports of violation to receive SEC protection against retaliation, and result in a lack of predictability for whistleblowers in assessing the viability of their claims and potential awards by requiring information that is “not generally known or available to the public”.
The amendments to the whistleblower rules become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.