Popular Topics
All Topics
- 401k
- Advertising
- Bankruptcy
- borrower
- Business Law
- Business organizations
- CARES Act
- collateralized mortgage-backed securities "CMBS"
- Commercial Lease
- commerical real estate
- compliance
- Contract
- Contractual disputes
- Copyright, Trademark and Other Intellectual Property
- coronavirus
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- COVID-19
- Delaware corporate law
- Delaware Law
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Digital Advertising
- distressed real estate
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Practices
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act "ERISA"
- employees
- Employment
- Estate Planning
- event of default
- Exemptions
- Families First Coronavirus Response Act "FFCRA"
- FDA
- Federal Laws & Regulations
- Force Majeure
- FTC
- HIPAA
- Insurance Company
- Insurance Coverage
- Intellectual Property
- IRS
- Law
- Laws
- Legislation
- lender
- Liquidity
- Litigation
- LLC
- loan restructurings
- Loans
- MAE
- Main Street
- Main Street Loans
- New York
- Notice
- Ordinary Course Covenant
- paid family leave
- pandemic
- Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)
- Payroll Protection Program (PPP)
- Privacy
- Property Insurance
- Public Companies
- Public M&A
- Q&A
- Real Estate
- Real Estate Litigation
- real estate restructuring negotiations
- retail
- Retirement Plan
- SEC
- Shareholder Activism
- shelter in place
- Small business
- Small Business Administration (SBA)
- Social Media
- Social Media Marketing
- State Law
- Sweepstakes Law
- Sweeptstakes Contest
- Tax
- Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
- Telemarketing
- Telemarketing Law
- Trademarks
- webinar
Recent Posts
- COVID-19 Resource Guide
- Distressed Real Estate Loan Restructurings in the COVID (and Post COVID) Environment
- Mark Limardo and Michael Passarella Present Webinar on the Paycheck Protection Program 2.0
- Delaware Chancery Court Provides Important Guidance on COVID-19’s Impact on a Buyer’s Obligation to Close:
- Olshan Branding Management and Protection Attorneys Present Webinar on Marketing in the COVID-19 Era to the Bronx Third Avenue BID
- Webinar - Retail Marketing Compliance in Post-COVID Era
- Your Estate Tax Exemption - Use It or Lose It
- Tax Decoupling During COVID-19
- The Continuing Reopening of New York – An Overview of Relevant New York, CDC, OSHA and EEOC Guidelines
- New York’s Executive Orders 202.8 and 202.28 Should Not Stop Commercial Lease Enforcement, Though New York City Legislation Sets Limitations on Landlords Seeking Recovery From Personal Guarantors for Tenant Defaults
Archives
- April 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
Contact Us
(212) 451-2300
info@olshanlaw.com
www.olshanlaw.com
Force Majeure? Contractual Performance During the Coronavirus Pandemic
Force Majeure? Contractual Performance During the Coronavirus Pandemic
Do the present circumstances excuse contractual performance? In general, performance will only be excused if: 1) there is a specific provision in the contract excusing performance upon the happening of particular events (a “force majeure” clause); or 2) performance becomes impossible as a result of some circumstance that could not have been foreseen at the time the contract was made.
These concepts are typically narrowly construed by courts; there is a strong preference in the law to enforce contracts. Thus, “force majeure” clauses will be narrowly read to encompass only listed events (and even then, only if the party seeking to be excused could not have prevented the event). And, the “force majeure” event must be the proximate, or direct, cause of the failure to perform.
Force majeure clauses are creatures of contract. There are no “standard” or prescriptive clauses, and such clauses—or any particular types of covered events—are not implied. Each contract must be examined individually to determine whether a force majeure clause exists, and each such clause must be read on its own terms to analyze what types of events are covered. Many force majeure clauses—particularly in construction contracts—will also delineate the obligations of the parties upon the occurrence of a listed event: is performance fully excused, or just suspended? If suspended, which party will bear any associated costs? These questions are answered by reference to the respective contract.
Absent a force majeure clause, a party may be relieved from performance of a contractual obligation through the common law if the obligation becomes impossible to perform, and such impossibility could not have been anticipated in the subject contract. Impossibility means more than just difficulty. Inconvenience, financial loss, required changes to planned operations, etc., will not excuse performance. Rather, the case law indicates that performance must have been rendered physically impossible, in the truest sense of that word, in order to relieve a non-performing party from liability. Typically, this means that either the means of performance, or the very subject matter of the contract, have been physically destroyed. These rules apply to “acts of God”—typically, the consequences of the “act of God” must have not been avoidable, and the “act of God” must have been directly involved in the destruction of the means of performance or of the subject matter of the contract.
Although sickness can be a basis for the common law defense of impossibility, such an excuse only applies where performance requires the services of a particular individual, who has become ill and thus cannot render the required services.
Governmental action, or changes in law, can also be a basis for a claim of common law impossibility. However, such action or changes still must result in actual impossibility; the fact that a governmental order or change in law makes performance more difficult, inefficient, or economically unprofitable, will generally not relieve a party from performance.
In response to the coronavirus pandemic, governments at various levels have taken some action that may render certain types of performance “impossible,” at least for the time being. In particular, government orders prohibiting gatherings of certain sizes may directly render certain contracts impossible to perform. These orders and guidelines are changing daily, and should be routinely monitored to determine whether a claim of impossibility could be successfully asserted. Copies of Governor Cuomo’s applicable Executive Orders can be found here.
Please contact Alex Ferrini, or your regular contact at Olshan, if you have any questions.