- Business Law
- Business organizations
- CARES Act
- collateralized mortgage-backed securities "CMBS"
- Commercial Lease
- commerical real estate
- Contractual disputes
- Copyright, Trademark and Other Intellectual Property
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Delaware corporate law
- Delaware Law
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Practices
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act "ERISA"
- Estate Planning
- event of default
- Families First Coronavirus Response Act "FFCRA"
- Federal Laws & Regulations
- Force Majeure
- Insurance Company
- Insurance Coverage
- Intellectual Property
- Main Street
- Main Street Loans
- New York
- paid family leave
- Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)
- Payroll Protection Program (PPP)
- Property Insurance
- Public Companies
- Real Estate
- Real Estate Litigation
- Retirement Plan
- Shareholder Activism
- shelter in place
- Small business
- Small Business Administration (SBA)
- State Law
- Sweepstakes Law
- Sweeptstakes Contest
- Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
- Telemarketing Law
- COVID-19 Resource Guide
- Webinar - Retail Marketing Compliance in Post-COVID Era
- Your Estate Tax Exemption - Use It or Lose It
- Tax Decoupling During COVID-19
- The Continuing Reopening of New York – An Overview of Relevant New York, CDC, OSHA and EEOC Guidelines
- PPP Loan Forgiveness Application Revised
- New York’s Executive Orders 202.8 and 202.28 Should Not Stop Commercial Lease Enforcement, Though New York City Legislation Sets Limitations on Landlords Seeking Recovery From Personal Guarantors for Tenant Defaults
- COVID 19 Health and Welfare Benefit Plans Update
- The Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act
- The Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act of 2020 (H.R. 7010)
COVID 19: Quarantine-Caused Vacancy Could Jeopardize Your Property Insurance Coverage
Every landlord carries property insurance protecting against damage sustained by real property. But current stay-at-home orders may permit insurers to disclaim coverage by relying on typical exclusions for vacant property. This client alert authored by Jeremy King identifies a potential pitfall in coverage contained in almost all property insurance forms and suggests that landlords act now to make sure that stay-at-home orders do not result in limitations on coverage available for future losses.
The COVID‑19 pandemic already has impacted businesses on almost every level. Previously, Olshan alerted clients to the possibility of insurance coverage for losses caused by the interruption of business. But, landlords need to be aware of other potential impacts the COVID‑19 response may have on their insurance protections.
Every landlord should have a property insurance policy that protects their real property from damage caused by catastrophic events, such as fire, flood, or earthquake. The coverages provided by such policies are typically on an “all risks” basis, meaning the coverage is very broad unless the cause of loss is specifically excluded in the policy. This broad coverage protects landlords from damage to property even if the cause of the loss is intentionally harmful conduct by bad actors, such as theft or vandalism.
Current COVID‑19 response includes stay-at-home or shelter-in-place orders from government authorities. In many states, restaurants, theaters, and even barber shops have been completely shut down. Even in situations where a single employee is permitted to be physically present in the workplace, the general absence of your tenants from their business location may negatively impact your coverage.
Property insurance policies typically carry a vacancy exclusion. This exclusion eliminates or reduces coverage for certain types of damages when the property qualifies as vacant. Importantly, the terms for vacancy in your insurance policy can vary widely from the principles of landlord-tenant law addressing abandonment. The standard language from one large insurer defines vacancy as:
Such building is vacant unless at least 31% of its total square footage is:
(a) Rented to a lessee or sub-lessee and used by the lessee or sub-lessee to conduct its customary operations; and/or
(b) Used by the building owner to conduct customary operations.
Such language can be particularly problematic for a landlord renting to a shuttered business. If the exclusion is triggered, the policy excludes loss caused by:
(2) Sprinkler leakage, unless you have protected the system against freezing;
(3) Building glass breakage;
(4) Water damage;
(5) Theft; or
(6) Attempted theft.
For all other coverages, if the exclusion is triggered, the insurer “will reduce the amount [it] would otherwise pay for the loss or damage by 15%.”
Landlords should consider their situation and contact their insurance brokers regarding what steps, if any, can be taken with their insurance carriers to mitigate or waive this exclusion during this extraordinary time in our country’s history. Although certain state legislatures are considering bills to help business owners obtain coverage under existing insurance policies, to date such legislative action has not addressed mandated absence by tenants. Potentially, a landlord may wish to explore covering its property with a policy designed for abandoned premises, which may result in premium savings and extra funds to use during this difficult period.
Olshan lawyers from multiple practice groups are working together with clients to address COVID‑19-related matters, including the CARES Act stimulus programs (i.e., the Paycheck Protection Program and EDIL) and other corporate matters, including contractual analysis and financing, tax, restructuring, employee benefits and employment practices, insurance coverage and litigation. Click here to access additional materials addressing issues raised by COVID‑19.
Consultation with experienced insurance professionals and counsel can provide a better understanding of the precise scope and limitations of insurance assets. Please contact the Olshan attorney with whom you regularly work or the attorney listed below if you would like to discuss further or have questions.