Popular Topics
All Topics
- 5 Pointz
- Advertising
- Advertising Law
- affordable housing
- AirBNB Lawsuit
- ALTA
- ALTA ACSM Standards
- Assemblages
- Bloomberg BNA
- Breach
- Broker-LawyerRelationship
- Broker’s license
- Building Loan Soft Costs
- Certified B corporation
- checklist
- Climate Change
- Commercial Condo
- Commercial Tenant Harassment Law
- commerical real estate
- Condo Developers
- condominium
- condos
- Contract
- Copyright, Trademark and Other Intellectual Property
- Corporate Law
- Corporate social responsibility
- Court Decisions
- COVID-19
- Crowdfunding
- Crowdfunding Rules
- CSR
- Delaware corporate law
- Delaware Good Faith
- Delaware Law
- Dodd-Frank Act
- environment, social and governance
- ESG
- event of default
- FinCEN
- foreclosure
- Fraud
- gross negligence
- ground leases
- Inequitable Conduct
- infrastructure
- Insurance Company
- Intellectual Property
- Internal Revenue Code
- internet
- ISLA
- Jennifer Plan
- Job Act Rules
- Joint Venture Agreements
- leasehold condominiums
- Limited Liability
- Limited Partnerships
- LLC
- LLC Agreement
- LLC Agreement Questions
- LLC Checklist
- LLC Mergers
- LLC taxation
- Loan Agreements
- MAE
- Mom and Pop Tenants
- Mortgage Subordination
- mortgages
- New York
- New York Attorney General
- New York City Council
- New York City Surveys
- New York Real Estate Journal
- Non-profit Organization
- NY Attorney General
- NY Real Estate in 2016
- NY Real Estate in 2018
- NYREJ
- NYS Land Surveyors Association
- NYS Lien Law
- Offering Plan
- online database listing
- opportunity zones
- Ordinary Course Covenant
- Passive Investors
- Public benefit corporation
- Public M&A
- Public Policy
- Purchase Contracts
- quality control
- Real Estate
- Real Estate Development Company
- Real Estate Financing Bureau
- Real Estate Litigation
- Real Estate LLC Agreements
- Real Estate Taxes
- Real Property Tax (RPT)
- Real-estate-advertising
- retail lease
- Rights of First Refusal
- ROFRs
- rural areas
- Sales
- Sales Tax
- section 1031 exchanges
- Securities & Exchange Commission
- Sellers
- Sole Discretion
- Specific Disclaimers
- Tax
- tax escalation clause enforcement
- tenancies in common
- TRIA
- VARA
- Visual Artists Rights Act
- Visual Examinations
- “High Volatility” (HVCRE) loans
Recent Posts
- Delaware Chancery Court Provides Important Guidance on COVID-19’s Impact on a Buyer’s Obligation to Close:
- Infrastructure Needed to Cure Digital Divide in the U.S.
- NYREJ Publishes Article by Thomas Kearns on Foreclosures for Technical Mortgage Defaults
- NYREJ Publishes Article by Thomas Kearns on Hotel Ground Lease Defaults
- NYREJ Publishes Article by Thomas Kearns on Gross Negligence
- NYREJ Publishes Article by Thomas Kearns on Returning to Offices After COVID-19
- NYREJ Publishes Article by Thomas Kearns on Protecting Co-Investors in LLC Agreements
- Acronyms, Abbreviation and Jargon in New York Commercial Real Estate
- NYREJ Publishes Article by Thomas Kearns on Top Legal Developments of 2019 in NY Real Estate
- NYREJ Publishes Article by Thomas Kearns on Mortgage Break-Up Fees
Archives
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
Contact Us
Thomas D. Kearns
tkearns@olshanlaw.com
@TDKearns
212.451.2273
NYREJ Publishes Article by Thomas Kearns and Bryan Anderson on Carefully Drafting ROFRs
New York Real Estate Journal published an article authored by Olshan Real Estate partner Thomas Kearns and associate Bryan Anderson entitled “Rights of First Refusal.”
Rights of first refusal (ROFRs) in real estate transactions are common, as is the litigation surrounding them. One of the reasons for the frequency of litigation is that, if not thoughtfully and carefully drafted, ROFRs can be broader reaching than intended and can obstruct future deals.
The recent Clifton Land Company LLC v. Magic Car Wash LLC Third Department case illustrates some of these challenges. Clifton Land, a company that was in the car wash business, had negotiated a ROFR on property improved by a car wash giving it the right to purchase the property “on the same terms as set forth in the third party offer.” The owners of the property sought to sell the property to a third party who owned a car wash across the street, and made the proposed transaction subject to a restriction on the use of the property preventing it from being used as a car wash for a period of ten years. Clifton Land sought to enforce its ROFR without being subject to this restriction. The court found that the ROFR was enforceable and not subject to the use restriction noting that the restriction was targeted to prevent the plaintiff from exercising its ROFR. The owners and third party buyer had not tried to ignore the ROFR but, rather, had tried to work around it by making it undesirable to the ROFR beneficiary. More carefully drafted limitations on this ROFR right may have provided the owners with greater freedom to transact.
We have seen similar challenges with ROFRs that were not well con-ceived at the time they were adopted. We represented a lender in a recent financing who negotiated a ROFR on a to-be-constructed building of the borrower in connection with the loan for the acquisition of the land.The borrower was happy to agree to the ROFR provisions at the time of closing the loan but was less happy when it came time to refinance the loan with a new lender and that new lender wanted the ROFR re-moved. As drafted, the ROFR was a stand-alone agreement operating independent of the loan. In the end, the borrower paid additional consider-ation to obtain a release of the ROFR from the lender in order to proceed with the refinancing transaction. Had the ROFR been limited in duration to the repayment of the financing or otherwise more carefully limited, the borrower may have had an easier time negotiating the refinancing.
Both of these scenarios illustrate that ROFRs create deal friction for new deals, but also illustrate the more subtle point that ROFRs are often not given their due attention and properly limited (whether tem-porally or substantively) at the time of original execution. Parties should think twice before readily agreeing to ROFR provisions, and take the time to carefully draft the provisions to avoid ambiguities and to avoid giving undue leverage to the ROFR beneficiary to obstruct future deals.
Thomas Kearns is a partner and Bryan Anderson is an associate with Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP’s real estate department, New York, N.Y.