<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/rss.xsl' ?>
			<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'
					xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
					xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
				<channel>
					<title>Advertising law Blog</title>
					<link>https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/2014/</link>
					<atom:link href='https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/2014/?rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
					<description><![CDATA[The latest updates to Advertising law Blog.]]></description>
					<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:18:10 -0400</lastBuildDate>
					
				<item>
				<title>The importance of clear and conspicuous disclosures in national advertising
and social media campaigns</title>
				<link>https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/Lustigman-Inside-Counsel-Advertising-Disclosures</link>
<dc:creator>Andrew B. Lustigman</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>Lustigman-Inside-Counsel-Advertising-Disclosures</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 09:00:01 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The sufficiency of the advertisements should be evaluated by analyzing whether they pass the four P&rsquo;s test.</strong></p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Privacy Groups Tells FTC That Topps’ Ring Pop Contest Violated COPPA</title>
				<link>https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/Topps-Contest-Violated-COPPA</link>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>Topps-Contest-Violated-COPPA</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:00:02 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Complaint says Ring Pop promotion violated children&rsquo;s privacy law, serves as an important reminder of COPPA.</strong></p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Legal Pitfalls in Utilizing Intellectual Property in Social Media</title>
				<link>https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/Pitfalls-Intellectual-Property-Social-Media</link>
<dc:creator>Andrew B. Lustigman</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>Pitfalls-Intellectual-Property-Social-Media</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:00:03 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ascertaining whether the appropriate rights have been secured need to be carefully considered, even if the marketer is seeking to act in real time.</strong></p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Even grown-up apps need to think about children’s privacy</title>
				<link>https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/Lustigman-COPPA-Ramifications-Inside-Counsel</link>
<dc:creator>Andrew B. Lustigman</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>Lustigman-COPPA-Ramifications-Inside-Counsel</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:00:04 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Inside Counsel article on COPPA Ramifications.</strong></p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Can online reviews provide substantiation for superiority claims?</title>
				<link>https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/Lustigman-Smith-InsideCounsel-OnlineReviews-Advertising</link>
<dc:creator>Andrew B. Lustigman</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>Lustigman-Smith-InsideCounsel-OnlineReviews-Advertising</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:00:05 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Inside Counsel article on using online reviews as advertising</strong></p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Eleventh Circuit Expands TCPA Definition of “Sender” Beyond Usual
Understanding of That Term</title>
				<link>https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/TCPA-Definition-of-Sender</link>
<dc:creator>Scott  Shaffer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>TCPA-Definition-of-Sender</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:00:06 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Court rules that a person does not have to actually send a fax in order to be considered the legal sender.</strong></p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Shaffer Comments on FCC’s TCPA Order in Law360</title>
				<link>https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/FCC-TCPA-Order-Faxed-Advertisements</link>
<dc:creator>Scott  Shaffer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>FCC-TCPA-Order-Faxed-Advertisements</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:00:07 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>FCC clarifies a confusing TCPA provision, leaving businesses hoping for clarity on other points.</strong></p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>TCPA: The Right Consent for the Right Message</title>
				<link>https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/Lustigman-Shaffer-Right-Consent</link>
<dc:creator>Andrew B. Lustigman, Scott  Shaffer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>Lustigman-Shaffer-Right-Consent</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:00:08 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Compliance with the TCPA consent requirements remains a daunting task fraught with peril.&nbsp;</strong></p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Lustigman Discusses Social Media Issues on The Peter Tilden Show</title>
				<link>https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/Lustigman-Peter-Tilden-Social-Media</link>
<dc:creator>Andrew B. Lustigman</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>Lustigman-Peter-Tilden-Social-Media</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:00:09 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Andrew Lustigman discusses legal issues and recent cases in social media.</strong></p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Recent Cases Highlight the Need at a Minimum to Carefully Review Underlying
Substantiation Provided by a Supplier</title>
				<link>https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/Supplier-Manufacturer-Responsibility-Ingredients</link>
<dc:creator>Andrew B. Lustigman</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>Supplier-Manufacturer-Responsibility-Ingredients</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:00:10 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>As typically the consumer facing entity, the manufacturer has potential exposure from regulators and consumers alike for disseminating potentially unsupported claims.</strong></p>]]></description>
</item>

			</channel></rss>